Maisha Perkins set it off with this one.
Two things have been troubling me this week. One was The Tavis Smiley and Al Sharpton disagreement. The other was this Black Abortion/Genocide debate. In some kind of way, I think the two are connected.
Let me begin by saying these are two of the most ridiculous things I have heard in a long while. At least since niggers were scared to vote for Obama because they believed he would be assassinated.
I heard about the abortion thing first but I ignored it. So let me do the same now and talk about Al Sharpton. I don’t agree with Al Sharpton all the time. Obviously! His eulogy for the N word led me to call people niggers more than ever. I dig Tavis Smiley and I REALLY dig Cornell West. But I was actually reversed in this situation. We don’t need to be calling each other out for trivial issues like who called whom and who didn’t.
AND we need to get off Obama’s dick. (I know I’m vulgar but I’m that serious about it.) We got Tavis Smiley and Cornell West (Sorry Dr. West) accusing the Obama administration of being politicians. WTF! Is anyone in the government NOT a politician?
Didn’t he wild out enough? Let’s not forget the past two term presidents all save the MAJOR wilding out for the last term.
We’re so wishy washy, all this jaw jacking could lead to Obama only serving one term. The BEST politician Washington has seen in decades and WE could fuck it all up. SMH. Do we have to complain that much? Do we really NEED to complain this much?
And now, we’re letting conservatives stir us up into believing someone wants to kill our babies. SMH. (did I just shake my head two paragraphs in a row?)
Birth control is everything from abstinence to condoms to the pills to abortion. Conservatives don’t think so but we live in America. Church and State remain separate for a reason. Everyone should know how I feel about naked-dickin (if you don’t please read). I can’t pretend it doesn’t happen though. Like I be trying to tell Al Sharpton, just because you don’t say a word doesn’t mean niggers and naked-dickers don’t exist!
I’ve lived in three chocolate-cities. In all three, the rate of teenage pregnancy and STDs are ridiculously high. In all three, I have witnessed an over abundance of birth control. From cases (CASES) of rubbers in the projects in New Orleans (I didn’t even have to buy rubbers. I just went to the projects and picked up a case.) to barrels (BARRELS) of rubbers on the streets of Atlanta. And still naked-dickers choose to risk disease and pregnancy.
I remember begging (PLEADING with) a young man in New Orleans to wear a rubber to no avail. I also remember the same night a young woman insisting that I naked dick her. As beautiful as she was, all I saw was the promise she was throwing down the drain on momentary pleasure.
Before I get off too deep on Naked-Dickers let me just sum up. These are the cases we are dealing with. This is not genocide. (I beg people to watch – Idiocracy) If anything, capitalism would promote naked dicking. I would. As a business owner, I need cheap labor. Since slavery is over and Hispanics are starting their own businesses, niggers and naked-dickers seem the best candidates.
“You can’t afford this child you are about to have? Poor baby.” “Don’t worry! We’ll keep him for you in foster care. Then we’ll hold him in prison for a few years. And by the time he’s out and has given up his hip-hop dreams, I’ll hire him. He’ll be perfect! Prison will have him up early all time. And at 35, he’ll be broke down enough to take WHATEVER I choose to pay him.” Can we say Win-Win?
It’s all about options. Adoption isn’t really an option for Black children. It's simple supply and demand. Black children don't get adopted. There is a high demand for white children. As Dana (On Mai Perkin’s Page) said, if we increased the demand for Black children in adoption, then abortion wouldn't be the primary option for unplanned pregnancies.
I’m all about being positive and being a math major I know that sometimes the most positive thing is the least negative. In some cases, abortion is the least negative. Contrasted against a life of poverty, never having existed is a much better option. And, remember, we are talking about the point when prospective parents decide they can’t afford a child.
The conspiracy is simple. Capitalists should and probably would support naked-dickin. Pro-Lifers are crazy! They will do anything. They blow up buildings like terrorists. And now they want to use Black people.
Despite this alleged recession, America is in good shape. Black America is in great shape. (We’ve been recession proof since forever!) Let’s not be distracted by finger pointing and conspiracy theories. There are still some miserable people around. We all know misery loves company and depressed people spend money. (It’s always about the money) Let’s keep our focus. Our communities and our nation have a bright future.
Shame on anyone who says otherwise!
Search This Blog
Showing posts with label romance. Show all posts
Showing posts with label romance. Show all posts
Tuesday, March 2, 2010
Tuesday, January 17, 2006
What women want
I thought I might explain some things because I have been encountering some strange women. Not strange in the weird, space ship, mystery kind of way. But strange in the out of the ordinary, I’m not used to these type of women way. This phenomenon is notable only because it may or may not be affecting the way I date. How do I begin? Let me just say it as straight as possible. I think I am having a hard time getting to it because this is really a perplexing situation. There are lines which I don’t want to cross. I have been opening myself up to people I barely know and this is all new to me. So I guess I just have to bite the bullet and go for it. What have I got to lose? I keep meeting women who continually misrepresent themselves.
That would be fine by itself except for the wild ways in which they misrepresent themselves and their response to my reaction or lack thereof to their behavior. In the end I am put out, because I lose the woman and don’t get anything out of it. Now I’m thinking I should explain how I approach dating.
There are two types of datable women. There are keepers and there are one night stand types. The keepers are quite simply girlfriend material. They are the ones you actually take out in public on dates and what not. The one night types are just for getting fucked out. They may get down right away or later on down the line but getting freaked out is all they are about.
So the problem I am having lately is the blurring of the lines between these two types of women. I am frequently encountering women who are the one night types but they come across as the keepers. Then there is internal conflict because I actually grow to like these women as women. Explanation time again. I am trying not to get into specifics but in most cases the issue is derived from women actually claiming they are keepers. This means I tend to make an actual effort to get to know the women. It also means I become a little more patient when it comes to sex. You see with keepers you want to build something. So that is what I focus on more than the sex. So, after some major chit chatting, phone calls, dates, quality time or some combination of the four, my mind is all over the place. I am completely unfocused on what I should be focused on. I still think of sex but I think of it in a different way. I think of the morning after and the next step. But in actuality, with these women there is no next step. This causes me to be less assertive. Less physical. I know how to be a man when I need to be and when to be mannish. Just ask my friends. I am always the one telling them they need to be more assertive. There are just a few lines I don’t cross. In fact I stay at least 50 feet away from those lines. Two things I never want to be are a stalker and a date rapist.
So, I talk a lot of shit but in those real intimate situations I am a little more cautious. Obviously, that often conflicts with my role as a man and leader in a relationship especially during the intimate times. Women need a man to be the initiator (to steal a friend’s word on the same subject). I always am but I respond to women’s cues. If there is no cue, I don’t act. If there is a mixed signal, I don’t act. If things are unclear, I don’t act. All of this is to say I avoid date rape situations. I don't push for sex unless I see an opening. If I'm alone with a woman and she has her arms crossed, legs crossed but internally is hoping I make a move, I never will. If I make a move and get rebuffed, I won't make another. Years ago, no meant no. Today, yes means yes. Sexually, there's nothing happening without an explicit invitation. I am a straight forward guy. I know how to ask for what I want.
I am also a gentleman. I don’t get into details because of that. I save all advances for intimate moments. I never want to misrepresent the lady I am dating at the moment. I understand women not wanting to be misrepresented or disrespected. In today’s society, women have the opportunity to control their dating scene to the most intimate detail. But their reputation is still at risk. Also, I don’t believe most men know exactly HOW to be gentlemen. Men try but etiquette is lost on recent generations.
As a result, it is more important for women to be careful of their reputation. But then there is a problem with a few ladies. These ladies don’t know how to be casual and still save their reputation. So they sell this dream of chastity and deep relationships when all they really want is to hook up from time to time. I see this as lying about who you are. That in itself is bad. In order for one of these women and I to relate I need to not only buy their dream but pretend I didn’t on two levels. Intimately I have to pretend to the girl that I am there with her on this magical dream of casual dating and chastity together. (Read: an open AND exclusive relationship) Then I have to pretend that I am not buying the dream she is selling. (I have to agree to be celibate but still try to fuck) But then I have to buy the dream this woman is selling in fact. And that is the third lie. (And they say men lie) Like I said, the only reason this is important is because lately I have caught myself buying some of these dreams. Not to mention the increasing numbers of these types of women.
I hope I was clear on my dilemma. I probably ran out of space and wrote too much. WOMEN I need help. What the hell is going on? How do I stop myself from falling folly to these fake women? How do I avoid becoming fake myself?
Following are comments from the original MySpace Post:
I don't know if it's that these women are fake and I'm not so sure you should group it together under the description of these women being such. Maybe some of them want the booty and want someone to settle with and be long-term with, but don't necessarily have to be involved with that particular long-term person to have sex with them, and possibly maybe they have just not found that - long-term quality in you so they keep it moving. Granted some of them may be fake, but I think what you have to do is not look to overcoming falling for these types, but do as you are. Take each one individually. Regardless how respectful you are, how careful you are with each one, you are dating. You will not no who's who and will not be able to rely on signs because each one, though lots of them may have similarities, are different. Despite the details that you have pointed out, you're still dating and dating is nothing more than a game where you have to find the right one. Get to know each of them and weed out the good one(s). That's just my perspective. I'm at work and don't have time to look over this and make sure I'm typing the ideas I'd like to reflect, so hopefully I've done so successfully. Good luck in trying to make sorts of it all. Love.
I'm sure you are right. As I was reading your response I came to realize that my problem is not the "fake thing" but the whole game. Why can't we all just be straight shooters for real, for real?
...because we run the risk of accidents and scars....
But by now isn't it obvious that those scars and accidents are unavoidable?
WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOW! Doggone, doggone, u write alot and have to say alot! I never knew these things from a POV. Doggone, doggone, it's really iinteresting that a man like u can right so f..doggone, doggone, pasi..sionately.
That would be fine by itself except for the wild ways in which they misrepresent themselves and their response to my reaction or lack thereof to their behavior. In the end I am put out, because I lose the woman and don’t get anything out of it. Now I’m thinking I should explain how I approach dating.
There are two types of datable women. There are keepers and there are one night stand types. The keepers are quite simply girlfriend material. They are the ones you actually take out in public on dates and what not. The one night types are just for getting fucked out. They may get down right away or later on down the line but getting freaked out is all they are about.
So the problem I am having lately is the blurring of the lines between these two types of women. I am frequently encountering women who are the one night types but they come across as the keepers. Then there is internal conflict because I actually grow to like these women as women. Explanation time again. I am trying not to get into specifics but in most cases the issue is derived from women actually claiming they are keepers. This means I tend to make an actual effort to get to know the women. It also means I become a little more patient when it comes to sex. You see with keepers you want to build something. So that is what I focus on more than the sex. So, after some major chit chatting, phone calls, dates, quality time or some combination of the four, my mind is all over the place. I am completely unfocused on what I should be focused on. I still think of sex but I think of it in a different way. I think of the morning after and the next step. But in actuality, with these women there is no next step. This causes me to be less assertive. Less physical. I know how to be a man when I need to be and when to be mannish. Just ask my friends. I am always the one telling them they need to be more assertive. There are just a few lines I don’t cross. In fact I stay at least 50 feet away from those lines. Two things I never want to be are a stalker and a date rapist.
So, I talk a lot of shit but in those real intimate situations I am a little more cautious. Obviously, that often conflicts with my role as a man and leader in a relationship especially during the intimate times. Women need a man to be the initiator (to steal a friend’s word on the same subject). I always am but I respond to women’s cues. If there is no cue, I don’t act. If there is a mixed signal, I don’t act. If things are unclear, I don’t act. All of this is to say I avoid date rape situations. I don't push for sex unless I see an opening. If I'm alone with a woman and she has her arms crossed, legs crossed but internally is hoping I make a move, I never will. If I make a move and get rebuffed, I won't make another. Years ago, no meant no. Today, yes means yes. Sexually, there's nothing happening without an explicit invitation. I am a straight forward guy. I know how to ask for what I want.
I am also a gentleman. I don’t get into details because of that. I save all advances for intimate moments. I never want to misrepresent the lady I am dating at the moment. I understand women not wanting to be misrepresented or disrespected. In today’s society, women have the opportunity to control their dating scene to the most intimate detail. But their reputation is still at risk. Also, I don’t believe most men know exactly HOW to be gentlemen. Men try but etiquette is lost on recent generations.
As a result, it is more important for women to be careful of their reputation. But then there is a problem with a few ladies. These ladies don’t know how to be casual and still save their reputation. So they sell this dream of chastity and deep relationships when all they really want is to hook up from time to time. I see this as lying about who you are. That in itself is bad. In order for one of these women and I to relate I need to not only buy their dream but pretend I didn’t on two levels. Intimately I have to pretend to the girl that I am there with her on this magical dream of casual dating and chastity together. (Read: an open AND exclusive relationship) Then I have to pretend that I am not buying the dream she is selling. (I have to agree to be celibate but still try to fuck) But then I have to buy the dream this woman is selling in fact. And that is the third lie. (And they say men lie) Like I said, the only reason this is important is because lately I have caught myself buying some of these dreams. Not to mention the increasing numbers of these types of women.
I hope I was clear on my dilemma. I probably ran out of space and wrote too much. WOMEN I need help. What the hell is going on? How do I stop myself from falling folly to these fake women? How do I avoid becoming fake myself?
Following are comments from the original MySpace Post:
I don't know if it's that these women are fake and I'm not so sure you should group it together under the description of these women being such. Maybe some of them want the booty and want someone to settle with and be long-term with, but don't necessarily have to be involved with that particular long-term person to have sex with them, and possibly maybe they have just not found that - long-term quality in you so they keep it moving. Granted some of them may be fake, but I think what you have to do is not look to overcoming falling for these types, but do as you are. Take each one individually. Regardless how respectful you are, how careful you are with each one, you are dating. You will not no who's who and will not be able to rely on signs because each one, though lots of them may have similarities, are different. Despite the details that you have pointed out, you're still dating and dating is nothing more than a game where you have to find the right one. Get to know each of them and weed out the good one(s). That's just my perspective. I'm at work and don't have time to look over this and make sure I'm typing the ideas I'd like to reflect, so hopefully I've done so successfully. Good luck in trying to make sorts of it all. Love.
I'm sure you are right. As I was reading your response I came to realize that my problem is not the "fake thing" but the whole game. Why can't we all just be straight shooters for real, for real?
...because we run the risk of accidents and scars....
But by now isn't it obvious that those scars and accidents are unavoidable?
WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOW! Doggone, doggone, u write alot and have to say alot! I never knew these things from a POV. Doggone, doggone, it's really iinteresting that a man like u can right so f..doggone, doggone, pasi..sionately.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)